interactive GDPR 2016/0679 EN

BG CS DA DE EL EN ES ET FI FR GA HR HU IT LV LT MT NL PL PT RO SK SL SV print pdf

2016/0679 EN jump to: cercato: 'would' . Output generated live by software developed by IusOnDemand srl

index would:

1 Article 14 Information to be provided where personal data have not been obtained from the data subject

1 Article 34 Communication of a personal data breach to the data subject

2 Article 36 Prior consultation

1 Article 61 Mutual assistance

whereas would:

definitions:

cloud tag:

and the number of total unique words without stopwords is: 384

Article 14

Information to be provided where personal_data have not been obtained from the data subject

1. Where personal_data have not been obtained from the data subject, the controller shall provide the data subject with the following information:

(a)	the identity and the contact details of the controller and, where applicable, of the controller's representative;

(b)	the contact details of the data protection officer, where applicable;

(c)	the purposes of the processing for which the personal_data are intended as well as the legal basis for the processing;

(d)	the categories of personal_data concerned;

(e)	the recipients or categories of recipients of the personal_data, if any;

(f)

where applicable, that the controller intends to transfer personal_data to a recipient in a third country or international_organisation and the existence or absence of an adequacy decision by the Commission, or in the case of transfers referred to in Article 46 or 47, or the second subparagraph of Article 49(1), reference to the appropriate or suitable safeguards and the means to obtain a copy of them or where they have been made available.

2. In addition to the information referred to in paragraph 1, the controller shall provide the data subject with the following information necessary to ensure fair and transparent processing in respect of the data subject:

(a)	the period for which the personal_data will be stored, or if that is not possible, the criteria used to determine that period;

(b)	where the processing is based on point (f) of Article 6(1), the legitimate interests pursued by the controller or by a third_party;

(c)	the existence of the right to request from the controller access to and rectification or erasure of personal_data or restriction of processing concerning the data subject and to object to processing as well as the right to data portability;

(d)	where processing is based on point (a) of Article 6(1) or point (a) of Article 9(2), the existence of the right to withdraw consent at any time, without affecting the lawfulness of processing based on consent before its withdrawal;

(e)	the right to lodge a complaint with a supervisory_authority;

(f)	from which source the personal_data originate, and if applicable, whether it came from publicly accessible sources;

(g)	the existence of automated decision-making, including profiling, referred to in Article 22(1) and (4) and, at least in those cases, meaningful information about the logic involved, as well as the significance and the envisaged consequences of such processing for the data subject.

3. The controller shall provide the information referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2:

(a)	within a reasonable period after obtaining the personal_data, but at the latest within one month, having regard to the specific circumstances in which the personal_data are processed;

(b)	if the personal_data are to be used for communication with the data subject, at the latest at the time of the first communication to that data subject; or

(c)	if a disclosure to another recipient is envisaged, at the latest when the personal_data are first disclosed.

4. Where the controller intends to further process the personal_data for a purpose other than that for which the personal_data were obtained, the controller shall provide the data subject prior to that further processing with information on that other purpose and with any relevant further information as referred to in paragraph 2.

5. Paragraphs 1 to 4 shall not apply where and insofar as:

(a)	the data subject already has the information;

(b)

the provision of such information proves impossible or would involve a disproportionate effort, in particular for processing for archiving purposes in the public interest, scientific or historical research purposes or statistical purposes, subject to the conditions and safeguards referred to in Article 89(1) or in so far as the obligation referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article is likely to render impossible or seriously impair the achievement of the objectives of that processing. In such cases the controller shall take appropriate measures to protect the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests, including making the information publicly available;

(c)	obtaining or disclosure is expressly laid down by Union or Member State law to which the controller is subject and which provides appropriate measures to protect the data subject's legitimate interests; or

(d)	where the personal_data must remain confidential subject to an obligation of professional secrecy regulated by Union or Member State law, including a statutory obligation of secrecy.

Article 34

Communication of a personal_data breach to the data subject

1. When the personal_data breach is likely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons, the controller shall communicate the personal_data breach to the data subject without undue delay.

2. The communication to the data subject referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall describe in clear and plain language the nature of the personal_data breach and contain at least the information and measures referred to in points (b), (c) and (d) of Article 33(3).

3. The communication to the data subject referred to in paragraph 1 shall not be required if any of the following conditions are met:

(a)

the controller has implemented appropriate technical and organisational protection measures, and those measures were applied to the personal_data affected by the personal_data breach, in particular those that render the personal_data unintelligible to any person who is not authorised to access it, such as encryption;

(b)	the controller has taken subsequent measures which ensure that the high risk to the rights and freedoms of data subjects referred to in paragraph 1 is no longer likely to materialise;

(c)	it would involve disproportionate effort. In such a case, there shall instead be a public communication or similar measure whereby the data subjects are informed in an equally effective manner.

4. If the controller has not already communicated the personal_data breach to the data subject, the supervisory_authority, having considered the likelihood of the personal_data breach resulting in a high risk, may require it to do so or may decide that any of the conditions referred to in paragraph 3 are met.

Section 3

Data protection impact assessment and prior consultation

Article 36

Prior consultation

1. The controller shall consult the supervisory_authority prior to processing where a data protection impact assessment under Article 35 indicates that the processing would result in a high risk in the absence of measures taken by the controller to mitigate the risk.

2. Where the supervisory_authority is of the opinion that the intended processing referred to in paragraph 1 would infringe this Regulation, in particular where the controller has insufficiently identified or mitigated the risk, the supervisory_authority shall, within period of up to eight weeks of receipt of the request for consultation, provide written advice to the controller and, where applicable to the processor, and may use any of its powers referred to in Article 58. That period may be extended by six weeks, taking into account the complexity of the intended processing. The supervisory_authority shall inform the controller and, where applicable, the processor, of any such extension within one month of receipt of the request for consultation together with the reasons for the delay. Those periods may be suspended until the supervisory_authority has obtained information it has requested for the purposes of the consultation.

3. When consulting the supervisory_authority pursuant to paragraph 1, the controller shall provide the supervisory_authority with:

(a)	where applicable, the respective responsibilities of the controller, joint controllers and processors involved in the processing, in particular for processing within a group_of_undertakings;

(b)	the purposes and means of the intended processing;

(c)	the measures and safeguards provided to protect the rights and freedoms of data subjects pursuant to this Regulation;

(d)	where applicable, the contact details of the data protection officer;

(e)	the data protection impact assessment provided for in Article 35; and

(f)	any other information requested by the supervisory_authority.

4. Member States shall consult the supervisory_authority during the preparation of a proposal for a legislative measure to be adopted by a national parliament, or of a regulatory measure based on such a legislative measure, which relates to processing.

5. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member State law may require controllers to consult with, and obtain prior authorisation from, the supervisory_authority in relation to processing by a controller for the performance of a task carried out by the controller in the public interest, including processing in relation to social protection and public health.

Section 4

Data protection officer

Article 61

Mutual assistance

1. Supervisory authorities shall provide each other with relevant information and mutual assistance in order to implement and apply this Regulation in a consistent manner, and shall put in place measures for effective cooperation with one another. Mutual assistance shall cover, in particular, information requests and supervisory measures, such as requests to carry out prior authorisations and consultations, inspections and investigations.

2. Each supervisory_authority shall take all appropriate measures required to reply to a request of another supervisory_authority without undue delay and no later than one month after receiving the request. Such measures may include, in particular, the transmission of relevant information on the conduct of an investigation.

3. Requests for assistance shall contain all the necessary information, including the purpose of and reasons for the request. Information exchanged shall be used only for the purpose for which it was requested.

4. The requested supervisory_authority shall not refuse to comply with the request unless:

(a)	it is not competent for the subject-matter of the request or for the measures it is requested to execute; or

(b)	compliance with the request would infringe this Regulation or Union or Member State law to which the supervisory_authority receiving the request is subject.

5. The requested supervisory_authority shall inform the requesting supervisory_authority of the results or, as the case may be, of the progress of the measures taken in order to respond to the request. The requested supervisory_authority shall provide reasons for any refusal to comply with a request pursuant to paragraph 4.

6. Requested supervisory authorities shall, as a rule, supply the information requested by other supervisory authorities by electronic means, using a standardised format.

7. Requested supervisory authorities shall not charge a fee for any action taken by them pursuant to a request for mutual assistance. Supervisory authorities may agree on rules to indemnify each other for specific expenditure arising from the provision of mutual assistance in exceptional circumstances.

8. Where a supervisory_authority does not provide the information referred to in paragraph 5 of this Article within one month of receiving the request of another supervisory_authority, the requesting supervisory_authority may adopt a provisional measure on the territory of its Member State in accordance with Article 55(1). In that case, the urgent need to act under Article 66(1) shall be presumed to be met and require an urgent binding decision from the Board pursuant to Article 66(2).

9. The Commission may, by means of implementing acts, specify the format and procedures for mutual assistance referred to in this Article and the arrangements for the exchange of information by electronic means between supervisory authorities, and between supervisory authorities and the Board, in particular the standardised format referred to in paragraph 6 of this Article. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(2).

whereas

(47) The legitimate interests of a controller, including those of a controller to which the personal_data may be disclosed, or of a third_party, may provide a legal basis for processing, provided that the interests or the fundamental rights and freedoms of the data subject are not overriding, taking into consideration the reasonable expectations of data subjects based on their relationship with the controller.
Such legitimate interest could exist for example where there is a relevant and appropriate relationship between the data subject and the controller in situations such as where the data subject is a client or in the service of the controller.
At any rate the existence of a legitimate interest would need careful assessment including whether a data subject can reasonably expect at the time and in the context of the collection of the personal_data that processing for that purpose may take place.
The interests and fundamental rights of the data subject could in particular override the interest of the data controller where personal_data are processed in circumstances where data subjects do not reasonably expect further processing.
Given that it is for the legislator to provide by law for the legal basis for public authorities to process personal_data, that legal basis should not apply to the processing by public authorities in the performance of their tasks.
The processing of personal_data strictly necessary for the purposes of preventing fraud also constitutes a legitimate interest of the data controller concerned.
The processing of personal_data for direct marketing purposes may be regarded as carried out for a legitimate interest.

- = -

(62) However, it is not necessary to impose the obligation to provide information where the data subject already possesses the information, where the recording or disclosure of the personal_data is expressly laid down by law or where the provision of information to the data subject proves to be impossible or would involve a disproportionate effort.
The latter could in particular be the case where processing is carried out for archiving purposes in the public interest, scientific or historical research purposes or statistical purposes.
In that regard, the number of data subjects, the age of the data and any appropriate safeguards adopted should be taken into consideration.

- = -

(63) A data subject should have the right of access to personal_data which have been collected concerning him or her, and to exercise that right easily and at reasonable intervals, in order to be aware of, and verify, the lawfulness of the processing.
This includes the right for data subjects to have access to data concerning their health, for example the data in their medical records containing information such as diagnoses, examination results, assessments by treating physicians and any treatment or interventions provided.
Every data subject should therefore have the right to know and obtain communication in particular with regard to the purposes for which the personal_data are processed, where possible the period for which the personal_data are processed, the recipients of the personal_data, the logic involved in any automatic personal_data processing and, at least when based on profiling, the consequences of such processing.
Where possible, the controller should be able to provide remote access to a secure system which would provide the data subject with direct access to his or her personal_data.
That right should not adversely affect the rights or freedoms of others, including trade secrets or intellectual property and in particular the copyright protecting the software.
However, the result of those considerations should not be a refusal to provide all information to the data subject.
Where the controller processes a large quantity of information concerning the data subject, the controller should be able to request that, before the information is delivered, the data subject specify the information or processing activities to which the request relates.

- = -

(86) The controller should communicate to the data subject a personal_data breach, without undue delay, where that personal_data breach is likely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of the natural person in order to allow him or her to take the necessary precautions.
The communication should describe the nature of the personal_data breach as well as recommendations for the natural person concerned to mitigate potential adverse effects.
Such communications to data subjects should be made as soon as reasonably feasible and in close cooperation with the supervisory_authority, respecting guidance provided by it or by other relevant authorities such as law-enforcement authorities.
For example, the need to mitigate an immediate risk of damage would call for prompt communication with data subjects whereas the need to implement appropriate measures against continuing or similar personal_data breaches may justify more time for communication.

- = -

(94) Where a data protection impact assessment indicates that the processing would, in the absence of safeguards, security measures and mechanisms to mitigate the risk, result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons and the controller is of the opinion that the risk cannot be mitigated by reasonable means in terms of available technologies and costs of implementation, the supervisory_authority should be consulted prior to the start of processing activities.
Such high risk is likely to result from certain types of processing and the extent and frequency of processing, which may result also in a realisation of damage or interference with the rights and freedoms of the natural person.
The supervisory_authority should respond to the request for consultation within a specified period.
However, the absence of a reaction of the supervisory_authority within that period should be without prejudice to any intervention of the supervisory_authority in accordance with its tasks and powers laid down in this Regulation, including the power to prohibit processing operations.
As part of that consultation process, the outcome of a data protection impact assessment carried out with regard to the processing at issue may be submitted to the supervisory_authority, in particular the measures envisaged to mitigate the risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons.

- = -

(129) In order to ensure consistent monitoring and enforcement of this Regulation throughout the Union, the supervisory authorities should have in each Member State the same tasks and effective powers, including powers of investigation, corrective powers and sanctions, and authorisation and advisory powers, in particular in cases of complaints from natural persons, and without prejudice to the powers of prosecutorial authorities under Member State law, to bring infringements of this Regulation to the attention of the judicial authorities and engage in legal proceedings.
Such powers should also include the power to impose a temporary or definitive limitation, including a ban, on processing.
Member States may specify other tasks related to the protection of personal_data under this Regulation.
The powers of supervisory authorities should be exercised in accordance with appropriate procedural safeguards set out in Union and Member State law, impartially, fairly and within a reasonable time.
In particular each measure should be appropriate, necessary and proportionate in view of ensuring compliance with this Regulation, taking into account the circumstances of each individual case, respect the right of every person to be heard before any individual measure which would affect him or her adversely is taken and avoid superfluous costs and excessive inconveniences for the persons concerned.
Investigatory powers as regards access to premises should be exercised in accordance with specific requirements in Member State procedural law, such as the requirement to obtain a prior judicial authorisation.
Each legally binding measure of the supervisory_authority should be in writing, be clear and unambiguous, indicate the supervisory_authority which has issued the measure, the date of issue of the measure, bear the signature of the head, or a member of the supervisory_authority authorised by him or her, give the reasons for the measure, and refer to the right of an effective remedy.
This should not preclude additional requirements pursuant to Member State procedural law.
The adoption of a legally binding decision implies that it may give rise to judicial review in the Member State of the supervisory_authority that adopted the decision.

- = -

(148) In order to strengthen the enforcement of the rules of this Regulation, penalties including administrative fines should be imposed for any infringement of this Regulation, in addition to, or instead of appropriate measures imposed by the supervisory_authority pursuant to this Regulation.
In a case of a minor infringement or if the fine likely to be imposed would constitute a disproportionate burden to a natural person, a reprimand may be issued instead of a fine.
Due regard should however be given to the nature, gravity and duration of the infringement, the intentional character of the infringement, actions taken to mitigate the damage suffered, degree of responsibility or any relevant previous infringements, the manner in which the infringement became known to the supervisory_authority, compliance with measures ordered against the controller or processor, adherence to a code of conduct and any other aggravating or mitigating factor.
The imposition of penalties including administrative fines should be subject to appropriate procedural safeguards in accordance with the general principles of Union law and the Charter, including effective judicial protection and due process.

- = -

dal 2004 diritto e informatica