interactive GDPR 2016/0679 EN

1. Where processing is based on consent, the controller shall be able to demonstrate that the data subject has consented to processing of his or her personal_data.

2. If the data subject's consent is given in the context of a written declaration which also concerns other matters, the request for consent shall be presented in a manner which is clearly distinguishable from the other matters, in an intelligible and easily accessible form, using clear and plain language. Any part of such a declaration which constitutes an infringement of this Regulation shall not be binding.

3. The data subject shall have the right to withdraw his or her consent at any time. The withdrawal of consent shall not affect the lawfulness of processing based on consent before its withdrawal. Prior to giving consent, the data subject shall be informed thereof. It shall be as easy to withdraw as to give consent.

4. When assessing whether consent is freely given, utmost account shall be taken of whether, inter alia, the performance of a contract, including the provision of a service, is conditional on consent to the processing of personal_data that is not necessary for the performance of that contract.

Article 49

Derogations for specific situations

1. In the absence of an adequacy decision pursuant to Article 45(3), or of appropriate safeguards pursuant to Article 46, including binding_corporate_rules, a transfer or a set of transfers of personal_data to a third country or an international_organisation shall take place only on one of the following conditions:

(a)	the data subject has explicitly consented to the proposed transfer, after having been informed of the possible risks of such transfers for the data subject due to the absence of an adequacy decision and appropriate safeguards;

(b)	the transfer is necessary for the performance of a contract between the data subject and the controller or the implementation of pre-contractual measures taken at the data subject's request;

(c)	the transfer is necessary for the conclusion or performance of a contract concluded in the interest of the data subject between the controller and another natural or legal person;

(d)	the transfer is necessary for important reasons of public interest;

(e)	the transfer is necessary for the establishment, exercise or defence of legal claims;

(f)	the transfer is necessary in order to protect the vital interests of the data subject or of other persons, where the data subject is physically or legally incapable of giving consent;

(g)

the transfer is made from a register which according to Union or Member State law is intended to provide information to the public and which is open to consultation either by the public in general or by any person who can demonstrate a legitimate interest, but only to the extent that the conditions laid down by Union or Member State law for consultation are fulfilled in the particular case.

Where a transfer could not be based on a provision in Article 45 or 46, including the provisions on binding_corporate_rules, and none of the derogations for a specific situation referred to in the first subparagraph of this paragraph is applicable, a transfer to a third country or an international_organisation may take place only if the transfer is not repetitive, concerns only a limited number of data subjects, is necessary for the purposes of compelling legitimate interests pursued by the controller which are not overridden by the interests or rights and freedoms of the data subject, and the controller has assessed all the circumstances surrounding the data transfer and has on the basis of that assessment provided suitable safeguards with regard to the protection of personal_data. The controller shall inform the supervisory_authority of the transfer. The controller shall, in addition to providing the information referred to in Articles 13 and 14, inform the data subject of the transfer and on the compelling legitimate interests pursued.

2. A transfer pursuant to point (g) of the first subparagraph of paragraph 1 shall not involve the entirety of the personal_data or entire categories of the personal_data contained in the register. Where the register is intended for consultation by persons having a legitimate interest, the transfer shall be made only at the request of those persons or if they are to be the recipients.

3. Points (a), (b) and (c) of the first subparagraph of paragraph 1 and the second subparagraph thereof shall not apply to activities carried out by public authorities in the exercise of their public powers.

4. The public interest referred to in point (d) of the first subparagraph of paragraph 1 shall be recognised in Union law or in the law of the Member State to which the controller is subject.

5. In the absence of an adequacy decision, Union or Member State law may, for important reasons of public interest, expressly set limits to the transfer of specific categories of personal_data to a third country or an international_organisation. Member States shall notify such provisions to the Commission.

6. The controller or processor shall document the assessment as well as the suitable safeguards referred to in the second subparagraph of paragraph 1 of this Article in the records referred to in Article 30.

Article 64

Opinion of the Board

1. The Board shall issue an opinion where a competent supervisory_authority intends to adopt any of the measures below. To that end, the competent supervisory_authority shall communicate the draft decision to the Board, when it:

(a)	aims to adopt a list of the processing operations subject to the requirement for a data protection impact assessment pursuant to Article 35(4);

(b)	concerns a matter pursuant to Article 40(7) whether a draft code of conduct or an amendment or extension to a code of conduct complies with this Regulation;

(c)	aims to approve the criteria for accreditation of a body pursuant to Article 41(3) or a certification body pursuant to Article 43(3);

(d)	aims to determine standard data protection clauses referred to in point (d) of Article 46(2) and in Article 28(8);

(e)	aims to authorise contractual clauses referred to in point (a) of Article 46(3); or

(f)	aims to approve binding_corporate_rules within the meaning of Article 47.

2. Any supervisory_authority, the Chair of the Board or the Commission may request that any matter of general application or producing effects in more than one Member State be examined by the Board with a view to obtaining an opinion, in particular where a competent supervisory_authority does not comply with the obligations for mutual assistance in accordance with Article 61 or for joint operations in accordance with Article 62.

3. In the cases referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, the Board shall issue an opinion on the matter submitted to it provided that it has not already issued an opinion on the same matter. That opinion shall be adopted within eight weeks by simple majority of the members of the Board. That period may be extended by a further six weeks, taking into account the complexity of the subject matter. Regarding the draft decision referred to in paragraph 1 circulated to the members of the Board in accordance with paragraph 5, a member which has not objected within a reasonable period indicated by the Chair, shall be deemed to be in agreement with the draft decision.

4. Supervisory authorities and the Commission shall, without undue delay, communicate by electronic means to the Board, using a standardised format any relevant information, including as the case may be a summary of the facts, the draft decision, the grounds which make the enactment of such measure necessary, and the views of other supervisory authorities concerned.

5. The Chair of the Board shall, without undue, delay inform by electronic means:

(a)	the members of the Board and the Commission of any relevant information which has been communicated to it using a standardised format. The secretariat of the Board shall, where necessary, provide translations of relevant information; and

(b)	the supervisory_authority referred to, as the case may be, in paragraphs 1 and 2, and the Commission of the opinion and make it public.

6. The competent supervisory_authority shall not adopt its draft decision referred to in paragraph 1 within the period referred to in paragraph 3.

7. The supervisory_authority referred to in paragraph 1 shall take utmost account of the opinion of the Board and shall, within two weeks after receiving the opinion, communicate to the Chair of the Board by electronic means whether it will maintain or amend its draft decision and, if any, the amended draft decision, using a standardised format.

8. Where the supervisory_authority concerned informs the Chair of the Board within the period referred to in paragraph 7 of this Article that it does not intend to follow the opinion of the Board, in whole or in part, providing the relevant grounds, Article 65(1) shall apply.

whereas

(14) The protection afforded by this Regulation should apply to natural persons, whatever their nationality or place of residence, in relation to the processing of their personal_data.
This Regulation does not cover the processing of personal_data which concerns legal persons and in particular undertakings established as legal persons, including the name and the form of the legal person and the contact details of the legal person.

- = -

(36) The main_establishment of a controller in the Union should be the place of its central administration in the Union, unless the decisions on the purposes and means of the processing of personal_data are taken in another establishment of the controller in the Union, in which case that other establishment should be considered to be the main_establishment.
The main_establishment of a controller in the Union should be determined according to objective criteria and should imply the effective and real exercise of management activities determining the main decisions as to the purposes and means of processing through stable arrangements.
That criterion should not depend on whether the processing of personal_data is carried out at that location.
The presence and use of technical means and technologies for processing personal_data or processing activities do not, in themselves, constitute a main_establishment and are therefore not determining criteria for a main_establishment.
The main_establishment of the processor should be the place of its central administration in the Union or, if it has no central administration in the Union, the place where the main processing activities take place in the Union.
In cases involving both the controller and the processor, the competent lead supervisory_authority should remain the supervisory_authority of the Member State where the controller has its main_establishment, but the supervisory_authority of the processor should be considered to be a supervisory_authority concerned and that supervisory_authority should participate in the cooperation procedure provided for by this Regulation.
In any case, the supervisory authorities of the Member State or Member States where the processor has one or more establishments should not be considered to be supervisory authorities concerned where the draft decision concerns only the controller.
Where the processing is carried out by a group_of_undertakings, the main_establishment of the controlling undertaking should be considered to be the main_establishment of the group_of_undertakings, except where the purposes and means of processing are determined by another undertaking.

- = -

(39) Any processing of personal_data should be lawful and fair.
It should be transparent to natural persons that personal_data concerning them are collected, used, consulted or otherwise processed and to what extent the personal_data are or will be processed.
The principle of transparency requires that any information and communication relating to the processing of those personal_data be easily accessible and easy to understand, and that clear and plain language be used.
That principle concerns, in particular, information to the data subjects on the identity of the controller and the purposes of the processing and further information to ensure fair and transparent processing in respect of the natural persons concerned and their right to obtain confirmation and communication of personal_data concerning them which are being processed.
Natural persons should be made aware of risks, rules, safeguards and rights in relation to the processing of personal_data and how to exercise their rights in relation to such processing.
In particular, the specific purposes for which personal_data are processed should be explicit and legitimate and determined at the time of the collection of the personal_data.
The personal_data should be adequate, relevant and limited to what is necessary for the purposes for which they are processed.
This requires, in particular, ensuring that the period for which the personal_data are stored is limited to a strict minimum.
Personal data should be processed only if the purpose of the processing could not reasonably be fulfilled by other means.
In order to ensure that the personal_data are not kept longer than necessary, time limits should be established by the controller for erasure or for a periodic review.
Every reasonable step should be taken to ensure that personal_data which are inaccurate are rectified or deleted.
Personal data should be processed in a manner that ensures appropriate security and confidentiality of the personal_data, including for preventing unauthorised access to or use of personal_data and the equipment used for the processing.

- = -

(91) This should in particular apply to large-scale processing operations which aim to process a considerable amount of personal_data at regional, national or supranational level and which could affect a large number of data subjects and which are likely to result in a high risk, for example, on account of their sensitivity, where in accordance with the achieved state of technological knowledge a new technology is used on a large scale as well as to other processing operations which result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of data subjects, in particular where those operations render it more difficult for data subjects to exercise their rights.
A data protection impact assessment should also be made where personal_data are processed for taking decisions regarding specific natural persons following any systematic and extensive evaluation of personal aspects relating to natural persons based on profiling those data or following the processing of special categories of personal_data, biometric_data, or data on criminal convictions and offences or related security measures.
A data protection impact assessment is equally required for monitoring publicly accessible areas on a large scale, especially when using optic-electronic devices or for any other operations where the competent supervisory_authority considers that the processing is likely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of data subjects, in particular because they prevent data subjects from exercising a right or using a service or a contract, or because they are carried out systematically on a large scale.
The processing of personal_data should not be considered to be on a large scale if the processing concerns personal_data from patients or clients by an individual physician, other health care professional or lawyer.
In such cases, a data protection impact assessment should not be mandatory.

- = -

(101) Flows of personal_data to and from countries outside the Union and international_organisations are necessary for the expansion of international trade and international cooperation.
The increase in such flows has raised new challenges and concerns with regard to the protection of personal_data.
However, when personal_data are transferred from the Union to controllers, processors or other recipients in third countries or to international_organisations, the level of protection of natural persons ensured in the Union by this Regulation should not be undermined, including in cases of onward transfers of personal_data from the third country or international_organisation to controllers, processors in the same or another third country or international_organisation.
In any event, transfers to third countries and international_organisations may only be carried out in full compliance with this Regulation.
A transfer could take place only if, subject to the other provisions of this Regulation, the conditions laid down in the provisions of this Regulation relating to the transfer of personal_data to third countries or international_organisations are complied with by the controller or processor.

- = -

(127) Each supervisory_authority not acting as the lead supervisory_authority should be competent to handle local cases where the controller or processor is established in more than one Member State, but the subject matter of the specific processing concerns only processing carried out in a single Member State and involves only data subjects in that single Member State, for example, where the subject matter concerns the processing of employees' personal_data in the specific employment context of a Member State.
In such cases, the supervisory_authority should inform the lead supervisory_authority without delay about the matter.
After being informed, the lead supervisory_authority should decide, whether it will handle the case pursuant to the provision on cooperation between the lead supervisory_authority and other supervisory authorities concerned (‘one-stop-shop mechanism’), or whether the supervisory_authority which informed it should handle the case at local level.
When deciding whether it will handle the case, the lead supervisory_authority should take into account whether there is an establishment of the controller or processor in the Member State of the supervisory_authority which informed it in order to ensure effective enforcement of a decision vis-à-vis the controller or processor.
Where the lead supervisory_authority decides to handle the case, the supervisory_authority which informed it should have the possibility to submit a draft for a decision, of which the lead supervisory_authority should take utmost account when preparing its draft decision in that one-stop-shop mechanism.

- = -

(131) Where another supervisory_authority should act as a lead supervisory_authority for the processing activities of the controller or processor but the concrete subject matter of a complaint or the possible infringement concerns only processing activities of the controller or processor in the Member State where the complaint has been lodged or the possible infringement detected and the matter does not substantially affect or is not likely to substantially affect data subjects in other Member States, the supervisory_authority receiving a complaint or detecting or being informed otherwise of situations that entail possible infringements of this Regulation should seek an amicable settlement with the controller and, if this proves unsuccessful, exercise its full range of powers.
This should include: specific processing carried out in the territory of the Member State of the supervisory_authority or with regard to data subjects on the territory of that Member State; processing that is carried out in the context of an offer of goods or services specifically aimed at data subjects in the territory of the Member State of the supervisory_authority; or processing that has to be assessed taking into account relevant legal obligations under Member State law.

- = -

(143) Any natural or legal person has the right to bring an action for annulment of decisions of the Board before the Court of Justice under the conditions provided for in Article 263 TFEU.
As addressees of such decisions, the supervisory authorities concerned which wish to challenge them have to bring action within two months of being notified of them, in accordance with Article 263 TFEU.
Where decisions of the Board are of direct and individual concern to a controller, processor or complainant, the latter may bring an action for annulment against those decisions within two months of their publication on the website of the Board, in accordance with Article 263 TFEU.
Without prejudice to this right under Article 263 TFEU, each natural or legal person should have an effective judicial remedy before the competent national court against a decision of a supervisory_authority which produces legal effects concerning that person.
Such a decision concerns in particular the exercise of investigative, corrective and authorisation powers by the supervisory_authority or the dismissal or rejection of complaints.
However, the right to an effective judicial remedy does not encompass measures taken by supervisory authorities which are not legally binding, such as opinions issued by or advice provided by the supervisory_authority.
Proceedings against a supervisory_authority should be brought before the courts of the Member State where the supervisory_authority is established and should be conducted in accordance with that Member State's procedural law.
Those courts should exercise full jurisdiction, which should include jurisdiction to examine all questions of fact and law relevant to the dispute before them.

- = -

dal 2004 diritto e informatica